Archived entries for

migrate cookies

- perhaps i am caged for real. i think i am emotionally "vacant". maybe im looking for a utopian figure that exists only in my head, maybe im only asking for what i deserve. either way there seems to be a shortage of individuals who meet my criteria. i wonder what is wrong with the world,or with me.

no, there's nothing wrong with me. i only demand what is rightfully mine and i wont take less. why should i? the world,on the other hand, thinks in a different way. the ways of the world tell me to accept what i am given,or what comes across my way. and settle for it. i never liked that, and i dont think i ever will. therefore i think i will be lonely for many more years (days?) to come. pretty much the same way i am now.

i sound arrogant dont i? and obstinate... i wont negate that. i dont know how i would sound to someone reading this entry in specific, i cant be two people at the same time. judge me if u will, i couldnt care less. it only serves to show how superficial u r. u could be right though. im not here to prove u wrong, im here to tell u and whoever is like u to sod off and say whatever coz im not listening. i stopped listening to u a long time ago,Dracula.

]]>

Timer mess

- Travelling through time is an impossibility, we all can recognise parts of that statement as eternal truth. Unless we're talking in a more abstract sense of the word, as in say, you "feel" you're living in Athens once you read a book about greek history or art, or if you go visit some touristic spot such as heritage village and you can grasp simple airs of how it was like to exist in such a frame of life... these are only two possibilities,naturally... there exist many more of how you can sense yourself in some other space that belongs to another time, be it the future of the past..sometimes even the present.

The reason why I'm busying myself with this particular idea is so simple. Why it was born could even sound ridiculous and trivial. Whenever I blog at home, the date of my entry is automatically recorded in the year 2008. I don't know why that happens, something must be going wrong in my PC timer or clock or whatever name it goes by. But what is yet more fascinating is the fact that I can actually blog the future NOW, i.e in the present. It's an option. and it's doable. Even though it wuld definitely be exposed to whoever reads my blog * not many readers i guess* .

Which brings to mind a question ... If I blog now, let's say an event such as my getting a foot massage in the afternoon of Sep. 14th,2009, and wait till that day arrives,and then I really get a foot massage in that exact day ..what would my feelings be like? what would i think? would I have pierced through a veil between reality and futurity? or would it just be a mere coincidence? or better yet, could it mean that I -subconsciously-
can steer the events of my life beforehand in whichever way I wish?

Isn't that such an empowering thought? To believe that I have the ability of preditcing the outcome,or happenings, of my life simply by wanting certain things to happen and not others? In many ways that happens everyday, but on a narrower scale. I don't know what coffee tastes like, because I am not interested in knowing that. Therefore I don't drink any coffee,so I reach my goal of not knowing what it tastes like. I believe it could happen in larger measures, if I want something sincerely, then it will happen. I believe in the mystique powers of the human brain, which also collaborate with the twists of fate and fortune.

**Fortune: an unknown and unpredictable phenomenon that causes an event to result one way rather than another; "bad luck caused his downfall"; "we ran into each other by pure chance"

This question is inevitable. I ponder on finding an answer to it all the time, and my train of thoughts never ceases to end.

Here's an interesting term:

** sword of Damocles

a constant and immanent peril; "the possibility hangs over their heads like the sword of Damocles"

]]>

The truth about butterflies

- Everybody seems to adore butterflies, and for obvious reasons. Their polychromatic wings, fragile grace and a number of characteristics attributed to them such as delicacy and beauty. I don't disagree. But I honestly think that butterflies are overrated.

A butterfly is a seemingly harmless and brilliant creature, if seen from a good distance. But if you look closely at the structure of its tenuous frame, you will be surprised. Personally, I "could" look at a butterfly provided its flying 5 + meters away from me. Any closer than that and it's color red for me. My whole world trembles.
You see, the truth that nobody ever mentions about butterflies is that they are ugly. Yes, ugly. Butterflies are hairy and they have weird faces. They are evidently stupid too. I'm not trying to give reasons why I'm butterfly/moth phobic. I'm just pointing out some long-concealed truths about them.

What I hate the most about butterflies is their random flying technique. It seems as though they have no idea where they want to go and this always means they have to fly close to me, or worse yet, land on me. I, of course, would have left the building before that happens. But it did happen – more than once- that I got trapped in a room and there were butterflies, and I could not escape. My heart almost jumped out of my ribs, and I sincerely could've had a stroke. Not to mention the string of pearly tears that rolled down my cheeks and the cry-outs for help and deliverance. Butterflies are scary.

*oh move your body girl*

Needless to say, the same applies to moths. The only difference is that moths make me literally freak out! How stupid is any creature willing to burn keenly Sfor the love of light?

*On second thoughts, many people do that. "Light" can mean knowledge. Pensive state. Think about that. *

What I find so amusing are the constant attempts people project, trying to fix me. Every time anyone knows about my phobia, she/he finds it imperative to tell me how ridiculous it is.

DuH~!

Phobias do NOT make sense. A phobia is an irrational fear of something. Then they start telling me how cute butterflies are * I've noticed * and all about their beauty and harmlessness. They do not realize that I don't want to be fixed, I hate butterflies and that's that. I dare anyone mention three reasons why I should like butterflies. Frankly, I can't see why I should like them or overcome my fear of them.

Butterflies: Go to hell. And stay there!

]]>

"Butt" seriously

You know how cosmo has all these articles about sex n bodily occupations * be they fashion,work outs,food* etc… well I somehow have an issue of cosmo that had instantly attracted my attention. The cover had a picture of a super sexy amazon, who seemed to belong to some paradise, and there was a bold title that read “Butt seriously”.

So here’s what I did the first time I saw that issue: I grabbed the mag,browsed hastily through the contents in search for that article. which,naturally, turned out to be more about pictures *of perfect models that only exist on mag pages* than useful words.

I personally think that cosmo limits the female mind, and worse yet, draws a negative image of it. I mean ok, I like fashion and i like lotsa other things that every other girl likes…I *am* a girl. But this doesn’t mean that I’m all about that, and that only. It just serves to quench my thirst for fashion and accessories and things of the sort. But what about my brain? my knowledge? my intellectual horizon?
I don’t know who to blame. Girls, the media, or male-dominated socities? In a way I find it right to blame all three.

Girls strive to gain the approval of guys or ,men. The media encourages this fever by displaying and trasnmitting messages that tell girls to go do WHATEVER IT TAKES to look good, in other words, to satisfy men’s desires. Society encourages this even more, because it is dominated by men and men want what they want. They want perfect looking girls who are centered on the sole idea of pleasing them. Men generally control the media,so they reflect this social tendency in the media. It’s like a loop.

* I seriously am NOT against men or anything. It just so happens that what I say makes sense to me. Relax, I like guys… OH, and I am straight <<<< stress that *

So back to my argument ..

I think that in many ways women are treated as inferior beings to men. The reasons for that are many, I won’t go through them now because I’m simply not in the mood for that. But anyhow, my point is this : we have gotten so used to treating women the way we do, that it doesn’t seem wrong anymore. It doesn’t annoy us nor does it annoy women themselves due to deeply-rooted ignorance in our societies. So feminists say things, I don’t necessarily agree with everything they say, but there’s alot of right in most of their presentations. And we reject their ideas completely. Why? Because they are different. and they are not like everything we’ve been brought up to believe is right, they contrast with our own beliefs which we have never questioned. In a way, we are in the wrong, and we are not trying to get out of it. Saying this, I am not implying that we should accept extremist feminist opinions, all I’m saying is that we have this constant fear of opening the door lest our ideas turn out to be wrong.

Funny how when I say these things to friends, female friends sometimes, I find some opposition. It’s also heart breaking how many girls are unaware of this fact. That they lack many things, that there is more to life than pleasing your boyfriend by looking so hot and sassy. What pains me the most is that they don’t even want to try to understand what I say, and I think that’s because of a limited mental capability that’s caused mainly by our deformed upbringing.
People are prejudiced against female thinkers or achievers. They immediately associate feminine success with some type of failure in another field, mainly social or physical. A thought that is in circulation is that if a female is successful then she must be either lifeless,nerdy,or ugly. * sometimes all three* Here’s the equation :

Successful female = No life + Book Dweller + Ugly

Needless to say, such an equation doesn’t exist for successful men. The equation in that case is somewhat like this :

Successful male = Perfect social life + Intelligence + Stable financial status (Consequently achieving satisfaction via women and earthly pleasures )

I got the chance of talking with so many people about this. I believe that women are capable, as much as men -if not more- of achieving any goal they want. This idea is generally ridiculed and disregarded in the course of discussion. The counter argument would almost always be something along the lines of : “Women were created to be mothers only. A woman should stay at home. A woman exists to please the man. Women should not compete with men financially because that “disrupts” the balance of life.” Well there are no sufficient words that could possibly describe how much I disagree with that.

I can’t see why a woman can’t be a great mother and a great achiever outside the confinement of four walls. I can’t see why an achieving woman should look any less appealing to the eyes of men. I can’t see why she can’t have her own financial stability. I’ll tell you what I think… I think most men are insecure and are raised with the notion that they are superior to women. Therefore,any sort of competition shakes their balance and famous ego. In their minds, they should be always “better” than women. Simply because they are called something else “men”. So when a woman is successful, they feel threatened that she might be more capable of achieving the dreams she aspires to than they are. They start inventing stories about her being a rebel who does not stick to the rules of society and who is a general disgrace. These ideas are also instilled in other women that are controlled by these men,and this explains the anti-feminist females. *the severity of this judgement varies from one society to another*

I don’t mean to sound aggressive or judgmental. Some men are capable of admitting that women can excel, and are so open minded that they share a woman’s success and accept it. Why shouldn’t they? Women do not threaten men. We are all one.

In my own way, I think I am trying to reflect an image of an intellectual female. I am trying to dismiss that same idea that says that if a female is intellectual then she’s ugly. I am pretty and I am smart. And I speak from my own experience when I admit that it has threatened many guys whom I’ve gotten to know. They are not used to dealing with a girl who is not all about pleasing them,but who also has her opinion in things. I can’t help them in that department, because I will not change as long as I find myself reflecting my beliefs.

Again I find it essential to stress this point : I am not against men,be they successful or not. I am not an extremist. I have carefully observed how things run in the world around me and formed my opinion accordingly. Think for yourself, then judge. Do not repeat a commonplace comment that you have heard somewhere. Think and be just.

On a final note, have you ever noticed how even language is bias in this regard? I always use the mixed pronouns he/she when I write. It’s only fair.

“Butt” seriously

- You know how cosmo has all these articles about sex n bodily occupations * be they fashion,work outs,food* etc... well I somehow have an issue of cosmo that had instantly attracted my attention. The cover had a picture of a super sexy amazon, who seemed to belong to some paradise, and there was a bold title that read "Butt seriously".

So here's what I did the first time I saw that issue: I grabbed the mag,browsed hastily through the contents in search for that article. which,naturally, turned out to be more about pictures *of perfect models that only exist on mag pages* than useful words.

I personally think that cosmo limits the female mind, and worse yet, draws a negative image of it. I mean ok, I like fashion and i like lotsa other things that every other girl likes...I *am* a girl. But this doesn't mean that I'm all about that, and that only. It just serves to quench my thirst for fashion and accessories and things of the sort. But what about my brain? my knowledge? my intellectual horizon?
I don't know who to blame. Girls, the media, or male-dominated socities? In a way I find it right to blame all three.

Girls strive to gain the approval of guys or ,men. The media encourages this fever by displaying and trasnmitting messages that tell girls to go do WHATEVER IT TAKES to look good, in other words, to satisfy men's desires. Society encourages this even more, because it is dominated by men and men want what they want. They want perfect looking girls who are centered on the sole idea of pleasing them. Men generally control the media,so they reflect this social tendency in the media. It's like a loop.

* I seriously am NOT against men or anything. It just so happens that what I say makes sense to me. Relax, I like guys... OH, and I am straight <<<< stress that *

So back to my argument ..

I think that in many ways women are treated as inferior beings to men. The reasons for that are many, I won't go through them now because I'm simply not in the mood for that. But anyhow, my point is this : we have gotten so used to treating women the way we do, that it doesn't seem wrong anymore. It doesn't annoy us nor does it annoy women themselves due to deeply-rooted ignorance in our societies. So feminists say things, I don't necessarily agree with everything they say, but there's alot of right in most of their presentations. And we reject their ideas completely. Why? Because they are different. and they are not like everything we've been brought up to believe is right, they contrast with our own beliefs which we have never questioned. In a way, we are in the wrong, and we are not trying to get out of it. Saying this, I am not implying that we should accept extremist feminist opinions, all I'm saying is that we have this constant fear of opening the door lest our ideas turn out to be wrong.

Funny how when I say these things to friends, female friends sometimes, I find some opposition. It's also heart breaking how many girls are unaware of this fact. That they lack many things, that there is more to life than pleasing your boyfriend by looking so hot and sassy. What pains me the most is that they don't even want to try to understand what I say, and I think that's because of a limited mental capability that's caused mainly by our deformed upbringing.
People are prejudiced against female thinkers or achievers. They immediately associate feminine success with some type of failure in another field, mainly social or physical. A thought that is in circulation is that if a female is successful then she must be either lifeless,nerdy,or ugly. * sometimes all three* Here's the equation :

Successful female = No life + Book Dweller + Ugly

Needless to say, such an equation doesn't exist for successful men. The equation in that case is somewhat like this :

Successful male = Perfect social life + Intelligence + Stable financial status (Consequently achieving satisfaction via women and earthly pleasures )

I got the chance of talking with so many people about this. I believe that women are capable, as much as men -if not more- of achieving any goal they want. This idea is generally ridiculed and disregarded in the course of discussion. The counter argument would almost always be something along the lines of : "Women were created to be mothers only. A woman should stay at home. A woman exists to please the man. Women should not compete with men financially because that "disrupts" the balance of life." Well there are no sufficient words that could possibly describe how much I disagree with that.

I can't see why a woman can't be a great mother and a great achiever outside the confinement of four walls. I can't see why an achieving woman should look any less appealing to the eyes of men. I can't see why she can't have her own financial stability. I'll tell you what I think... I think most men are insecure and are raised with the notion that they are superior to women. Therefore,any sort of competition shakes their balance and famous ego. In their minds, they should be always "better" than women. Simply because they are called something else "men". So when a woman is successful, they feel threatened that she might be more capable of achieving the dreams she aspires to than they are. They start inventing stories about her being a rebel who does not stick to the rules of society and who is a general disgrace. These ideas are also instilled in other women that are controlled by these men,and this explains the anti-feminist females. *the severity of this judgement varies from one society to another*

I don't mean to sound aggressive or judgmental. Some men are capable of admitting that women can excel, and are so open minded that they share a woman's success and accept it. Why shouldn't they? Women do not threaten men. We are all one.

In my own way, I think I am trying to reflect an image of an intellectual female. I am trying to dismiss that same idea that says that if a female is intellectual then she's ugly. I am pretty and I am smart. And I speak from my own experience when I admit that it has threatened many guys whom I've gotten to know. They are not used to dealing with a girl who is not all about pleasing them,but who also has her opinion in things. I can't help them in that department, because I will not change as long as I find myself reflecting my beliefs.

Again I find it essential to stress this point : I am not against men,be they successful or not. I am not an extremist. I have carefully observed how things run in the world around me and formed my opinion accordingly. Think for yourself, then judge. Do not repeat a commonplace comment that you have heard somewhere. Think and be just.

On a final note, have you ever noticed how even language is bias in this regard? I always use the mixed pronouns he/she when I write. It's only fair.

]]>

optional, for use on longer entries

- That's what the program says next to the word "Subject". optional,eh? what is that anyhow? what's optional? what's a choice as opposed to an option? are they synonims? Do languages provide synonims as an "entertaining" alternative for original words? If so, then which are the originals and which are the alternatives?

I think I'm just tired. I better go sleep before I come up with some peace treaty with my thoughts and the world.

]]>