As covered by media, Amnesty International’s August 23rd report on the Israeli aggression war over Lebanon goes out to point Israeli lies to the naked eye of the public. It is imperative that you read this report and understand it well, if need be, print it out and run the numbers time and again in your head. I shall quote some bits of the report, they are not as long as they seem.

“The Israeli Air Force launched more than 7,000 air attacks on about 7,000 targets in Lebanon between 12 July and 14 August, while the Navy conducted an additional 2,500 bombardments.(1) The attacks, though widespread, particularly concentrated on certain areas. In addition to the human toll – an estimated 1,183 fatalities, about one third of whom have been children(2), 4,054 people injured and 970,000Lebanese people displaced(3) – the civilian infrastructure was severely damaged. The Lebanese government estimates that 31 “vital points” (such as airports, ports, water and sewage treatment plants, electrical facilities) have been completely or partially destroyed, as have around 80 bridges and 94 roads.(4) More than 25 fuel stations(5) and around 900 commercial enterprises were hit. The number of residential properties, offices and shops completely destroyed exceeds 30,000.(6) Two government hospitals – in Bint Jbeil and in Meis al-Jebel – were completely destroyed in Israeli attacks and three others were seriously damaged.(7) “

“Israeli government spokespeople have insisted that they were targeting Hizbullah positions and support facilities, and that damage to civilian infrastructure was incidental or resulted from Hizbullah using the civilian population as a “human shield”. However, the pattern and scope of the attacks, as well as the number of civilian casualties and the amount of damage sustained, makes the justification ring hollow. The evidence strongly suggests that the extensive destruction of public works, power systems, civilian homes and industry was deliberate and an integral part of the military strategy, rather than “collateral damage” – incidental damage to civilians or civilian property resulting from targeting military objectives. “

On the topic of war crimes, and Israel in this field has not been cheap in granting us material, AL states that:

“It is also forbidden to use starvation as a method of warfare, or to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population. Some of the targets chosen – water pumping stations and supermarkets, for example – raise the possibility that Israel may have violated the prohibition against targeting objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population.

Israel has asserted that Hizbullah fighters have enmeshed themselves in the civilian population for the purpose of creating “human shields”. While the use of civilians to shield a combatant from attack is a war crime, under international humanitarian law such use does not release the opposing party from its obligations towards the protection of the civilian population.

Many of the violations examined in this report are war crimes that give rise to individual criminal responsibility. They include directly attacking civilian objects and carrying out indiscriminate or disproportionate attacks. People against whom there is prima facie evidence of responsibility for the commission of these crimes are subject to criminal accountability anywhere in the world through the exercise of universal jurisdiction.”

The report looks on the grave damage caused by Israel in all aspects of life in Lebanon; water facilities,ports, hospitals,roads and bridges,airports, communications,civilian homes, electricity and fuel supply, and the environment.

On blockades:

“Any vehicle of any kind travelling south of the Litani River will be bombarded, on suspicion of transporting rockets, military equipment and terrorists.”

Leaflet addressed to “the Lebanese people”, signed the “State of Israel”, 7 August 2006(35)

Here’s the link to the full Amnesty International report:
Israel/Lebanon
Deliberate destruction or “collateral damage”? Israeli attacks on civilian infrastructure

Need I remind you that Israeli planes violated Lebanese skies, despite the issuance of the UN Security Council resolution 1701 on August 11th, 2006, which in points 3 and 5:

- “Emphasizes the importance of the extension of the control of the
Government of Lebanon over all Lebanese territory in accordance with the
provisions of resolution 1559 (2004) and resolution 1680 (2006), and of the relevant
provisions of the Taif Accords, for it to exercise its full sovereignty”

…and

“Also reiterates its strong support, as recalled in all its previous relevant
resolutions, for the territorial integrity, sovereignty and political independence of
Lebanon within its internationally recognized borders, as contemplated by the
Israeli-Lebanese General Armistice Agreement of 23 March 1949″

On that, read this (published in the UN News Centre on August 19th,2006):

“The Secretary-General is deeply concerned about a violation by the Israeli side of the cessation of hostilities as laid out in Security Council resolution 1701statement. Adopted on 11 August, that text mandated a halt to the fighting which took effect three days later.

There have also been several air violations by Israeli military aircraft, according to the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), which is helping to support and coordinate the Israeli withdrawal.

Mr. Annan said violations of Security Council resolution 1701 such as the Israeli raid today “endanger the fragile calm that was reached after much negotiation and undermine the authority of the Government of Lebanon.”

Now, give a round of applause to your incompetent media, ineffectual leaders, and dwindling humanity.

Wish our decision makers are this solid in their points and eloquent in their words. Go Galloway!

I’m on CNN? They must know better than I do, shush!

Just when you think the world has reached the final,most atrocious prejudice against most causes related to Arabs and Muslims, it stuns you with a tad more of manipulation.

I was browsing the net casually and I came upon some blogs that claim that the Qana massacre was staged by major news agencies. It’s actually funny when I reflect on it since I also read that the picture capturing Israeli kids dedicating rockets for Lebanese children were also “staged“.

Now the word “staged” sounds to me like a focal point in those extremists’ vocabulary. It’s almost as if their message to the world is: If we do something wrong, and you find out about it, we’ll just claim it was “staged“. Some people do not get to see these things LIVE on their TVs, so they’ll be convinced of our super lame fabrications. Oh, and if anyone else does something to us, and you dare say it was “staged“, then you will be branded as being anti-semitic (Yes, we monopolized semitism a long long time ago. Arabs are really semitic too since they’re our cousins but we don’t like them much so we took the title for ourselves).

Via KABOBfest, I could not have said it better myself: (”His” and “he” refer to the author of a blog called EU Referendum).

“The basic premise of his argument is that the timestamps accompanying the posted photographs represent when they were taken. Thus, the aforementioned photos were taken from 12:45 pm to 4:30 pm, therefore there must have been some chicanery.

First of all, to the able-minded, when presented with such a range of timestamps, the normal conclusion drawn is that the times do not represent when the photographs were taken, but rather when they were posted. It’s difficult for me to imagine how somebody could, instead, come up with the argument of EU Referendum – without doing any basic research to verify the ill-conceived notion – that, clearly, Hizballah, the Arabs, and the wire services have colluded to shock the world.

Second, the timestamps do represent when the photographs were posted, not taken; this can be established by comparing the times accompanying photographs between different wire news providers. (for example, compare Yahoo with the Corpus Christi Caller Times). They post at different times, and that is why the same photographs will have a different time stamp on different news sites.

Finally, here is the easiest and most dispositive proof. Let’s take a look at a photograph that EU Referendum cites. He claims this one was photographed at 4:09 PM ET based on the Yahoo News timestamp. It’s quite possible that Richard thinks that the Atlantic is a river, so there must be a trivial, if any, timezone difference. There’s a seven hour difference between Qana, Lebanon and the Eastern Time Zone. Thus, that 4:09 PM time that he references would mean the picture was taken at an actual time of 11:09 PM. Simply impossible – there would be no daylight.

Similarly, he shows us that this one was taken at 4:30 PM ET, which would be 11:30 PM in Lebanon. Finally, he points to this photo, which he claims had an original timestamp of 7:16 pm corrected to 6:46 am. The link he provides does not direct us to the right page, however a simple search of Yahoo News (his source for the photographs) leads us to this same exact photo, and the only one of its kind with the caption he copies-and-pastes from Yahoo News. The timestamp is 6:58 PM ET, July 31st. That would place the actual time of the photograph at 1:58 AM, August 1st, a full two days after the massacre.

Of course, this could be Hizballah’s version of “Pallywood,” right Rush Limbaugh? Clearly, this “rubble” and these “dead children” were actually photographed in a Hizballah studio emulating a daytime setting in Qana. AP, Reuters, and AFP are all in on this scam that took place over three days, from July 30th through August 1st. It’s all part of that godless liberal media’s war on Israel, the U.S., and democracy.”

- Source (KABOBfest)

One last thing, now who’s being the paranoid conspiracy theorist? Pathetic.